Import financing
- When to use it
- Extend payment terms to the foreign supplier without consuming your own cash.
- What it protects
- Working capital during transit and customs clearance.
Solution 01
The set of instruments that funds the operation, mitigates counterparty risk and protects margin against FX. Choosing the right instrument is usually worth more than chasing the lowest rate.
The problem
In international trade, payment and delivery almost never coincide. Weeks or months pass between invoice, shipment, clearance and settlement — and that gap is where an operation makes or loses money.
The exporter ships before being paid; the importer pays before receiving goods. Guarantee instruments — letters of credit, SBLC, documentary collection — move that risk to a financial institution.
Between contract and settlement the rate moves. Without a hedge, the margin negotiated in the spreadsheet is not the margin realised in the results.
The gap
Payment and delivery rarely happen at the same time. Between invoice, shipment, customs clearance and settlement, your capital is idle — and exposed to FX.
Order and contract
Supplier negotiation
Shipment
Document issuance
Transit
International freight
Customs clearance
Duties and taxes
Sale and collection
Inventory turnover
Exposed cash
Counterparty risk and FX risk
Columbia finances this gap
FINIMP, ACC/ACE, export credit, LC, NDF
Instruments
Select what you need to solve. Each instrument carries its own tenor, currency, documentary burden and total cost — and the cheapest is rarely the most suitable.
Foreign-currency funding contracted outside Brazil
Companies commonly hunt the cheapest facility before mapping tenor, currency and the quality of the payer. In well-structured operations total cost falls because the instrument was chosen while designing the contract — not after shipment.
Bring a concrete case — product, origin, tenor and volume. We'll come back with the financial and operational structure that fits.